Hi Capprim,

Sorry for all the shortcomings you experience.

Images can be attached here, but are limited to 500 pixels high.

The Icon is discussed here by the Director of Support. (So you know I understand your description of the Icon).
https://support.maxon.net/hc/en-us/articles/7464109638812-Troubleshooting-Capsules

The filter entry would be
license: subscription
(I don't find the M-1 Icon anymore with this entry.)
If you like to find something inside the provided results, like "stone"
license:subscription + stone

I would save the
license: subscription +
or the
license: subscription
As preset with the little triangle on the right, see image, to not have the need to type this all the time:

I will write a report/suggestion to make that more automated, like a button to pull the license data automatically in the Asset Search. (Edit: Report and suggestion filed /edit)
Yes, and Thank you: Please submit something that fits your needs. "Share Your Ideas". Very kind of you.

Let me know if that works for you.

Enjoy your Sunday

Hi Capprim,

I'm not aware that the license you have would limit any content in Cinema 4D and Redshift. Hence my "heart" suggestion. Is there anything you tried to use and have no access?
Perhaps time to clear that with Support.
https://www.maxon.net/en/support-center

The heart suggestion was just one option to combine it with Filters (not meant as - Filter works only with a heart selection), to have a radically reduced presentation of just the materials you like to see.

In the image (in my first reply), you can select whole groups.

The third way I mentioned was via filters, and there are suggestions in the link (documentation.

If all of that is not working, I asked to share your needs (Share your Ideas) with Maxon directly.

Your question is in the Filter preset section like this license:<<subscription,perpetual,trial,lite,student,education,cineware,mxo>>

Or anything you have used
usecount:>=2
I use 2 here because one time might be based on exploration

I hope that helps

Have a great weekend.

Hi Capprim,

Yes, it has grown substancially, and while everyone (I assume) has differnt needs, the option to filter are given. If that is not enough, please share your specific needs in the "Share Your Ideas".
https://www.maxon.net/en/support-center

Please have a look at the attached image. The three "disc" icon will allow for a main sorting of content.

There is a lot more to filter content, and even if the main filtering works, mark the one you use with a "Favorite" (Heart) and you get only what you want, if filtered accordingly.
https://help.maxon.net/c4d/2026/en-us/Default.htm#html/79842.html?TocPath=The%2520Asset%2520Browser%257C_____3

Enjoy your weekend

Hi c4disstanky,
Sorry for your trouble.

I have no manual workaround for this, which means, please check with tech-support:
https://www.maxon.net/en/support-center

My best wishes for a quick solution

Hi MaverickMongoose,

I'm not aware that a Vertex Map can provide a direction for the Force Field object. What direction would have a Vertex map with all points set to the same value?

I would use it in the Fields tab and in the Object tab, setting an object that allows for providing any directional information, such as a Linear Field or the Volume Object with added object(s) and set to Vector.

(In your file: You have Vector information inside the Vertex Map> Fields, but when you open the Hierarchy, the Direction Indicator [the arrow] is not given to the Sphere).

Here is your file back (Press Play)
https://projectfiles.maxon.net/Cineversity_Forum_Support/2025_PROJECTS_DRS/20251010_CV4_2026_drs_25_SIvm_01.c4d.zip

Cheers

P.S.2: Here is a simulation-based alternative.
This technique utilizes the Connector (the same object) to create the effect.
CV4_2026_drs_25_SIcs_01.c4d
.

A different way can be created with this Quick Tip:
https://youtu.be/JwjDc8zIlN0?si=JkTYhXRfqv9idMMS
Here, the Poles Per Point have a much higher variation regarding adjustments.
CV4_2026_drs_25_SIcs_11.c4d
.

Of course, in the end, the result counts, and the example should help you find the best option for you.

Enjoy!

P.S.: ZG, FYI - I filled a report.

I explored this a little bit farther. The Rope Tag with these options was last time native in before v2023. The App 2023 has already a new Rope tag, same icon, but the options are very different. Interestingly enough, it doesn't work before or after 2024.

Anyway, here is a refined Joint Dynamic version
CV4_2026_drs_25_CAjd_11.c4d

Hi ZG,

Thanks for the file. I have loaded the file in 2024 to see the effect.

In 2025, the Robe has completely changed. Call up a new Rope tag and compare. It is a complete updated functionality.

I have checked the usual suspect data channels if that was mentioned somewhere, I can't find an entry.

The same result as in 2025 is given in 2026. I have no idea how to replicate your result exactly from 2024.

You asked for an alternative: I explored the use of Joints and IK, set to Dynamic, but it might come close, but not a match.
Example sketch:
CV4_2026_drs_25_CAjd_01.c4d

Since I believe that is an issue based on code, and it needs the attention of the developers, to decide if the 2024 features should be possible in 2026, for example, I suggest opening a ticket with support to get at least a second opinion, just in case I missed something.
https://www.maxon.net/en/support-center

Thanks for doing that, and sorry for the trouble.

All the best

Thank you very much for the kind feedback, Nick.

Please let me know if you need anything else for this project. I'm happy to look into it!

Enjoy your project.

Thanks for the reply, MaverickMongoose.

You may also explore the Attribute Manager> Mode> Scene> Simulation> Simulation> Steps.

Think of a sphere on your table, a real metal sphere, and a real table, how often would you estimate the sphere tests if the table provides resistance to go through? [∞?]

Since we most likely do not have a supercomputer farm running our simulation, the forces an object has to collide with another are tested a few times, but surely not infinitely. So when the motion of an object is fast, it might test for no collision, but when the next test happens, it is already beyond the collision point. Well, that is also not that simple, as a sphere collides with points above the collision surface halfway through. Therefore, the sampling or steps need to be higher to prevent this from happening, as it can become stuck partially inside an object.

If there is a high velocity, it appears to be messing with gravity, but it is reaching only a speed that is too fast for the steps to be successful in determining a collision. The search radius is a helpful feature, providing an early warning (simplified).

I avoid mentioning the substep option early, as it changes the course of the outcome.

Cheers