Will do, thanks. I pivoted to a different solution for the job. But I'd still like to know, so I'll post an example file as soon as I can free up time.

Will do, thanks.

@entry-newspaper
I'm glad you found a solution!

Anybody? I can't be the only one who needs to make something like this work.

You're very welcome, entry-newspaper!

Let me know if there is anything else, about this subject here, or in a new "thread".

Cheers

Thank you very much, entry-newspaper.

Yes, the time difference is there, and it is a more than "noticeable" one. Of course, the engines are different, and how they apply, for example, displacement.

I'm not sure if I can find more than reducing the time to a 1/3rd, but of course, that is always project dependent. Perhaps exploring increasing the Samples to a very high number might help.

I will check later what the RS forum shared.

Cheers

Thank you very much for the feedback, entry-newspaper.

If I get the direction where it has to go right, the need would be to have a visual time scale option that provides a loose resemblance to the timeline.
The key component to consider here is, of course, that the whole setup stays intact when the frame rate needs an adjustment for different markets or targets.

Thank you for your patience with this.

My best wishes for your project

Thank you very much, entry-newspaper.

Let me know how it goes and what else is needed. I'm happy to look into it.

Enjoy

Thank you for your feedback, entry-newspaper.

My best wishes for your project.

Thank you, entry-newspaper.

Cheers

Thank you for the reply, entry-newspaper.

I have seen it from time to time, no idea what it causes, but since I do not use double-click a lot (I work mostly from a tablet), I drag the files on the icon in the dock. So, I'm not the one with the most experience with double-clicks anymore. Besides, if the file is a fake file, it might open something else (Yes, pure neurotic, based on too much security training that I have to take. 😉

All the best

Thank you very much, entry-newspaper.

Have a pleasant weekend as well! 🙂

Thanks for the reply, entry-newspaper.

I didn't want you to feel bad; it was more of an explanation for why I couldn't answer in a precise way. Sorry, it was received that way! I'm aware how my words can be received around the world in different ways. Yet, this happens. I should be more careful. Thank you for keeping going.

In the object manager>Object> Object Information. Tell me the number of the Volume object after it is made editable. That will help me to check.

Cheers

Thank you for your reply, entry-newspaper.

If you render something out, either and B&W image or an alpha/mask image of that anyway, please try the Vectorizer. It is in the Menu that leads with the green SDS icon.

Example
CV4_2025_drs_25_STai_11.c4d
BW_vectorizer.jpg

Sadly there is no direct way.

My best wishes for your project and enjoy your weekend

Have a great Holiday as well, entry-newspaper. Thank you!
🙂

Thank you, entry-newspaper,

I look forward to your findings.

Cheers

Thanks for the reply, entry newspaper.

My best wishes for your project.

Please note that we have a company-wide Summit over the next nine days, starting tomorrow, so I will be less likely to be online.

My best wishes for your project

Hi entry newspaper,

If you want to see what is used for the Surface Emitter, switch on the option in the Draw tab.
Example
CV4_2025_drs_25_PArs_01.c4d
or here
CV4_2025_drs_25_PArs_11.c4d
Screenshot 2025-05-02 at 2.33.44 PM.jpg
When I overlay the particle flow as it comes from the emitter with a cached version turned into an Alembic (while the Alembic is one frame ahead, so I offset it, as I settled the streams in P.Y to show where they are, see image. it is the same.
Screenshot 2025-05-02 at 11.05.02 AM.jpg

I can't reproduce your findings. Please check with tech support
https://www.maxon.net/en/support-center

Have a great weekend.

Thank you for being open to this, entry-newspaper.

I understand Tech-Support is supported with tech; it is not limited to bug support. We all want things to work smoothly. I never considered it as an isolated single question/answer. If there is something to improve or fix, it is to the advantage of many.

Fingers crossed, there is some improvement afterward.

All the best

My best wishes