CINEVERSITY

Thanks for the update, Dutchbird.

Fingers crossed, either Apple will find a solution or the developers from Maxon will find a workaround.

My best wishes

Hi Mark,

I'm glad you got what you need.

Thank you very much for the reply!

Enjoy your project.

Thank you very much, signature-view.

What is the RS-Log telling you?

When you grow from 0% (Sweep), you start with zero points; anything else changes. Sometimes each frame. Motion Blur can't produce anything useful when the points change.

Please explore this file:

CV4_2025_drs_24_RSmb_13.c4d

Also, if you use the Connect object, if there is animation, the Weld option can sabotage the Motion blur, as it changes the point structure.

All the best

Thank you very much, leather-recipe,

Yes, there are post-production ways. Thanks for pointing this out.

As a side note: Back when Twixter (RevisionFX) was The way to go, the suggested use was that already slowed-down footage from the camera resulted in even better quality when "time-stretched" in post. Combining these two might be something to keep in mind.

Thanks again!

My best wishes

Thank you, Craig.

It is often unclear what one likes and what the problem is. 🙂 Your answer helps. Thank you.

If there is anything else, like the uneven scene, perhaps check with small spheres it the same problem shows up. If so, share the file, please.

Enjoy

Thank you, _carsonjones.

It will support similar requests, but I have to mention that we do not copy from other apps. If one likes to work with Modo, then Modo is the app to use. None of the major 3D apps go shopping by the other vendor. I just do some expectation management here.

Otherwise, we end up emulating Maya, 3DMax, Houdini, etc, which is not the target. I assume other apps have the same idea about their architecture and strategy.

Cheers

Hi DaveMDarcy,

I can't reproduce this here. I would need the file (Dropbox, Google, Adobe, Apple, or Wetransfer only, thank you). Make sure that only the needed files are in the folder where your sequence is.

Please check with tech support:
https://www.maxon.net/en/support-center

Sorry for the trouble.

All the best

Hi Gemini,

Yes, please send all ideas to Maxon "Share Your Ideas". Thank you for doing that. This is the direct way.

Thanks for any suggestion you share with Maxon.

The Layout video is just a short clip, not a tutorial
https://projectfiles.maxon.net/Cineversity_Forum_Support/2023_Clips_DRS/20230222_Layout_Templade_01.mp4

I hope that helps.

Cheers

Hi _carsonjonas,

Not to my knowledge.

If you need this, please make a suggestion here: "Share Your Idea"
https://www.maxon.net/en/support-center

Thanks for your time

All the best

Thank you

I'm glad you have what you need, external-competition.

My best wishes for your project.

You're very welcome, smckenzie!

Thanks for the reply.

My best wishes for your project.

Thank you very much for the reply, Javier.

I'm glad we found what you like to have.

My best wishes for your project!

Thanks for the feedback, Tom.

There are many options to combine things that can cause situations that are difficult to solve automatically in 3D setups.

Do you have this in mind?
https://www.maxon.net/en/cinema-4d/features/thicken-generator?srsltid=AfmBOorf1T6n-4-HTF3qt-BwHe91cSF_vNFxO8jF5x7arq5cA4pVG3lU

Here is a 20-second clip that showcases the problem:
https://stcineversityprod02.blob.core.windows.net/$web/Cineversity_Forum_Support/2024_Clips_DRS/20241104_Thicken-Problem-Bevel.mp4

Since you wrote that you are not in love with weighting, even though you did a great job here weighting it, the solution would be, as shown in the video from the website, that the Bevel would be part of the model and is already driven by the overall weighting. With this, there is no sudden "pop-in" at one specific angle of the Bevel added geometry or the flip when the edge changes 90º.

Here is my suggestion on a simple level:
CV4_2025_drs_24_ANcb_01.c4d

Anyway, I understand this should have an option to tell the tools, do this, and avoid that. I get that.

This leaves me here, as I can't change the code (of course not), to share this link, so you have your wish directly shared with Maxon. Fastest and most observed inbox for suggestions:
https://www.maxon.net/en/support-center
"Share Your Idea!"

Sorry that I can't give you a better answer.

All the best

Hi Arzillo,

To my knowledge, it is not an option; hence, I shared the file above with you.

When the MG Voronoi Fracture object is made editable, the previously available information is not included in the Polygon objects. The Random Effector does not reproduce this in Deformer mode.

All the best

You're very welcome, MaverickMongoose.

Thank you for the feedback

Cheers

You're very welcome, engineer-make.

Each tracking that has some challenges is a learning process, which I love. Here the key was to interpolate the features when they were obscured.

I have very little to really finish it, like measurements, but this might come close:

https://stcineversityprod02.blob.core.windows.net/$web/Cineversity_Forum_Support/2024_PROJECTS_DRS/20241103_Red-shot_tracking_04.zip
I have loaded the py version here:
CV4_2025_drs_24_MOmg_21.c4d

I couldn't resist to put a figure in it, as a test.
CV4_2025_drs_24_MOmg_22.c4d
Thanks again for the kind feedback. 🙂

My best wishes for the project

Thanks for the reply; highlight size.

Perhaps explore if a single Spline between two "ports" might give you more options. You can also set up single splines, merge them into one, and explore the segment options of the catenary spline modifier.

Enjoy your project

This is very kind of you, MaverickMongoose.

Have a great weekend

Hi Mark,

Could it be that you accidentally hit the H key? (Composition check short cut)

Screenshot 2024-11-02 at 10.50.19 PM.jpg

All the best

Hi chain-entrance,

The site issue forum is for problems like being unable to access the appropriate forum.

Please do not use this Site Issue Forum for questions regarding the application; thank you.

The C-Motion has no option to keyframe things.

All the best